[j-nsp] VPLS pass tagged/untagged traffic

Kevin Wormington kworm at sofnet.com
Sun Mar 8 15:58:03 EDT 2015


Kompella l2vpn works just fine.  I was trying to see if this could be 
done using VPLS so it could be E-LAN and not just point-to-point.

On 03/08/2015 11:47 AM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
> Try CCC:
> https://mellowd.co.uk/ccie/?p=4428
>
> --
> Eduardo Schoedler
>
> Em domingo, 8 de março de 2015, Kevin Wormington <kworm at sofnet.com
> <mailto:kworm at sofnet.com>> escreveu:
>
>     Eduardo,
>
>     I have tried the following for encapsulation on the ingress port.
>     The vpls connections are down...one in the LD status and the other
>     in RD. PE2 logical system configured identically other than using
>     port ge-1/1/8 as ingress.
>
>     main instance:
>
>          ge-1/1/0 {
>              encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
>              flexible-vlan-tagging;
>          }
>
>
>
>     on the PE1 logical system:
>              interfaces {
>                  ge-1/1/0 {
>                      unit 0 {
>                          encapsulation vlan-vpls
>                          vlan-id-range 1-4096
>                          family vpls; (have tried with and without this)
>                      }
>                  }
>
>     then on the routing instance in PE1:
>
>              routing-instances {
>                  VPLS1 {
>                      instance-type vpls;
>                      vlan-id all;
>                      interface ge-1/1/0.0;
>                      route-distinguisher 10.100.0.4:100
>     <http://10.100.0.4:100>;
>                      vrf-target target:127:100;
>                      protocols {
>                          vpls {
>                              site-range 4;
>                              site CE1 {
>                                  site-identifier 1;
>                              }
>                          }
>                      }
>                  }
>              }
>
>
>
>     On 03/08/2015 01:37 AM, Eduardo Schoedler wrote:
>
>         Probably is your encapsulation on ingress port.
>
>         --
>         Eduardo
>
>         Em domingo, 8 de março de 2015, Kevin Wormington <kworm at sofnet.com
>         <mailto:kworm at sofnet.com>> escreveu:
>
>              Hi,
>
>              On MX (Specifically MX80 w/12.3R9.4) is it possible to pass all
>              customer CE traffic whether it's tagged or untagged from a
>         port on
>              PE1 to a port on PE2 using VPLS (BGP/RSVP)?
>
>              I have a lab system using logical systems with ports looped
>         back and
>              I can get untagged traffic to work fine, but can't seem to
>         get it to
>              pass everything through.
>
>              Thanks,
>
>              Kevin
>              ___________________________________________________
>              juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>         https://puck.nether.net/____mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>         <https://puck.nether.net/__mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp>
>              <https://puck.nether.net/__mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>         <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp>>
>
>
>
>         --
>         Eduardo Schoedler
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>     https://puck.nether.net/__mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>     <https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp>
>
>
>
> --
> Eduardo Schoedler
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list