[j-nsp] VPLS pass tagged/untagged traffic

[Kevin Wormington]

Chris,

Thanks, I just tried it and this works...guess I was making it more 
difficult that it needed to be.  I haven't tested spanning tree through 
it or other layer2 control protocols but you are thinking they should 
pass through just like and l2vpn?

Thanks again,

Kevin

On 03/08/2015 05:52 PM, Chris Kawchuk wrote:
> Err, why not just something like:
>
>          interfaces {
>               ge-1/1/0 {
>                   mtu 9192;
>                   encapsulation ethernet-vpls;
>                   unit 0;
>               }
>
> That will accept untagged, tagged, double tagged, etc... It makes the VPLS "not care" whats going on in that port. Doesnt even care about TPIDs. Even takes spanning tree and such.
>
> Ensure not to declare any vlan-id in the routing-instance VPLS {} stanza. No translations ingress/egress.
>
> - Ck.
>
>
>
> On 09/03/2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> on the PE1 logical system:
>>           interfaces {
>>               ge-1/1/0 {
>>                   native-vlan-id 4096
>>                   unit 0 {
>>                       encapsulation vlan-vpls
>>                       vlan-id-range 1-4096
>>                       family vpls; (have tried with and without this)
>>                   }
>>               }
>