[j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence

[Scott Granados]

Yes, similar issues on the MX480 with Sampled when inline flow was enabled.


On Mar 23, 2015, at 6:30 AM, Adam Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk> wrote:

> Does this affect other MX series boxes as well please?
> 
> adam
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
>> Of Jordan Whited
>> Sent: 20 March 2015 17:41
>> To: Tan Heng Chai
>> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 BGP Convergence
>> 
>> observed with inline sampling enabled, 1.5m in RIB, and one v4 feed (~250k
>> active-paths) changing state
>> 
>> 11.4R7.5 - 10+ minutes
>> 12.3R8.7 - ~220 seconds
>> 14.2R1.9 - ~200 seconds
>> 
>> YMMV
>> 
>>> On Mar 20, 2015, at 1:09 PM, Tan Heng Chai <admin at sg.gs> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi J-NSP,
>>> 
>>>       Just wondering if anyone has benchmark/feedback on BGP
>> convergence times on the MX80 with and without sampling on versions
>> higher than 11.4R7.5, especially with reference to PR836197 and the sampling
>> issue?
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Yours Sincerely,
>>> 
>>> Tan Heng Chai
>>> Chief Technical Officer - SG.GS
>>> http://www.sg.gs
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
> For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp