[j-nsp] EVPN

[Antonio Sanchez-Monge]

Adam,

Please check with your Juniper sales representative. The rumour you heard might not necessarily reflect reality.

> On 06 May 2015, at 11:44, "Adam Vitkovsky" <Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi Chuck,
> 
> I'd like to hear about the war stories from EVPN as well.
> I was really disappointed to hear that Juniper does not consider implementing PBB-EVPN on MX at all.
> So it seems now that we are stuck with high memory utilization and all the drawbacks of pure EVPN.
> 
> adam
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
>> Of Chuck Anderson
>> Sent: 05 May 2015 15:48
>> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EVPN
>> 
>>> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 05:53:54PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>>> Is anyone doing EVPN in production yet?
>> 
>> I take it from the deafening silence that either no one is doing EVPN
>> in production, or no one is willing to admit it.
>> 
>> Is anyone willing to share any experiences with EVPN, such as results
>> from testing in the lab?  I'm spinning up my lab now.
>> 
>> I'm mainly interested in using EVPN on MX as a replacement/instead of
>> deploying VPLS in an enterprise environment in order to move to a
>> purely L3/MPLS core (eliminate L2 bridging and STP from core).
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
> For more information please visit http://www.mimecast.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp