[j-nsp] Cisco ASR 9001 vs Juniper MX104

[Mark Tinka]

On 30/Nov/15 13:27, Saku Ytti wrote:

> For either of these NAT is bit awkward, as it's going to have to go
> via separate service card anyhow. Unless you could live with 1:1 NAT,
> but I believe CarrierNAT implies NAPT.
> If all traffic is NAPTed traffic, you might want  to go with ASR1k instead.

Agree - if you want NAT, the ASR1000 is the ideal platform for this.

The ASR1000 line has just got a refresh as well, so from a scaling
perspective, you've got both the low- and high-end options.

Mark.