[j-nsp] Multi Core on JUNOS?

[Giuliano (WZTECH)]

And the change now announced on 15.1 (new release) using freebsd 10 will not help to solve it ?

> On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:33, Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Saku,
> 
> You seem to be very familiar with the major routing vendors implementations
> on SMP. Do you consider the lack of SMP support on Juniper a reason not to
> go with Juniper until implemented. Particularly interested to hear about
> JunOS vs TimOS.
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
>> 
>> On 3 October 2015 at 03:41, Olivier Benghozi
>> <olivier.benghozi at wifirst.fr> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey,
>> 
>>> I have heard that:
>>> 1) forget it about PowerPC CPUs (MX 80/104).
>> 
>> This is shame, but completely understandable, give customers couple
>> more years on old kit or force them to buy new kit? I'm afraid maybe
>> no HW of current generation will get SMP support. I'm sure marketing
>> is pondering lot how many customers would switch vendor versus how
>> many customers would just buy new next-gen hardware when deciding
>> which platforms to target for SMP.
>> 
>> I honestly believe that SMP is weekend project for single developer on
>> JunOS now that they've remedied the underlaying FreeBSD issues. Fixing
>> rpd mess is certainly big deal. But just affinity to put RPD on its
>> own core and rest on the other core on MX80/MX104 should be terribly
>> trivial.
>> 
>> Even radar plans for RPD + threads is far cry from what other vendors
>> are doing already with SMP on XR, EOS and particularly TimOS. But
>> still very nice that JNPR is finally doing something.
>> 
>> --
>>  ++ytti
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp