[j-nsp] LACP

[joel jaeggli]

On 10/14/15 2:54 PM, Michael Loftis wrote:
> You do not want to do LACP (or any ae)  over dissimilar links.  You
> will be on a trail of tears of poor performance and wonky behavior.
> LACP/ae is NOT designed for dissimilar links.

if they are nominally similar capacity l3 ecmp with and igp or bfd for
forwarding failure detection is just fine. if you're trying to build a
comon L2 you likely will be sad.

joel

> On Wed, 14, 2015 at 8:15 AM, David Samaniego <david1984ba at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all. I need to create an LACP between two ex3300-24t. This can be
>> of the links transport provider allows me only 802.1Q and the other only
>> 802.1ad.
>> It might be possible to configure the LACP?
>>
>> I appreciate any insight that can be provided.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 229 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20151014/bb1ad228/attachment.sig>