[j-nsp] nat / cg nat / vrf aware nat (pe nat)

[Aaron]

Thanks, yes, I would be wanting NAPT (I believe this is NAT
Overload/PAT).... yes I would want this for the public IP address savings
that it achieves.  

If I do NAPT, why would I want MS-DPC over MS-PIC or vice versa?

Aaron



-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Amarjeet Singh
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 7:07 PM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net; josh.hoppes at gmail.com; mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] nat / cg nat / vrf aware nat (pe nat)

Inline NAT can be used on MPC's if you are looking for basic forms of NAT
like Source and destination NAT. Inline NAT only supports 1:1 static
mapping.

If you want to deploy NAPT then need MS-DPC or MS-PIC

Br, Amarjeet


>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:13:36 +0200
> From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu>
> To: Josh Hoppes <josh.hoppes at gmail.com>, Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com>
> Cc: Juniper List <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] nat / cg nat / vrf aware nat (pe nat)
> Message-ID: <560B7D90.2000308 at seacom.mu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
>
>
> On 30/Sep/15 00:17, Josh Hoppes wrote:
>
> > For  CG-NAT you're likely going to be looking at the MS-MIC or 
> > MS-MPC in an MX and a license for the function. The smaller MX (MX80 
> > and
> > MX104) can use the MS-MIC if you're looking for something with a 
> > smaller footprint. I'm not certain of any limitations as I've not 
> > deployed it.
>
> To add, the community has been accustomed to running NAT on Cisco 
> routers for decades, and so it can come as a surprise when certain 
> hardware built for a specific purpose from Cisco does not have NAT 
> supported, as there are fewer and fewer software-based routers 
> targeted at the service provider market from Cisco nowadays.
>
> Juniper have always supported their features in hardware from Day One 
> (until, of course, the J-series routers). So as with the Cisco of 
> today, you will need an MS-MIC or MS-DPC to run NAT on a Juniper MX 
> platform (or the equivalent MS-PIC/AS-PIC for the older M- and T-series
routers).
>
> I'm not an SRX user, but I suppose NAT should be inherently supported 
> in there as well.
>
> Mark.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp