[j-nsp] JUNOS precision-timers for BGP
Timur Maryin
timamaryin at mail.ru
Thu Apr 28 08:00:59 EDT 2016
Hi Adam,
On 25-Apr-16 17:16, Adam Chappell wrote:
>
> Currently in a situation troubleshooting consequences of high CPU usage
> with a number of aggravating factors. Most sensitive to the scarcity of CPU
> resources however is a number of BGP sessions with aggressive timers.
skip
> I'm aware of PR1044141 which apparently causes pain when used in
> conjunction with traceoptions, but I'm keen to understand if others have
> operational experience.
If you seek to reduce load on RPD you should not enable excessive
traceoptions for sure :)
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list