[j-nsp] JUNOS precision-timers for BGP

Timur Maryin timamaryin at mail.ru
Thu Apr 28 08:00:59 EDT 2016


Hi Adam,


On 25-Apr-16 17:16, Adam Chappell wrote:
>
> Currently in a situation troubleshooting consequences of high CPU usage
> with a number of aggravating factors. Most sensitive to the scarcity of CPU
> resources however is a number of BGP sessions with aggressive timers.

skip

> I'm aware of PR1044141 which apparently causes pain when used in
> conjunction with traceoptions, but I'm keen to understand if others have
> operational experience.


If you seek to reduce load on RPD you should not enable excessive 
traceoptions for sure :)



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list