[j-nsp] LDP flaps specifically present on ACX Juniper routers (ACX4000 and ACX1100)
Mileto Tales
miletotalesgter at gmail.com
Sat Apr 30 17:21:01 EDT 2016
Upgrade the firmware to version 12.3X54-D25. There is a bug in version D20. We had the same problem and the fix was the upgrade.
MT
> On 30 de abr de 2016, at 16:51, joel ahumuza <ahm.joel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Leonidas,
> We have our boxes running 12.3X54-D20.7, what version do you have ?
>
>
>> On 30 April 2016 at 22:48, Leonidas Romualdo <leo.ghoul at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Upgrade the Firmware!
>>
>> We had the same problem with the ACXs..
>>
>>
>>> On Saturday, 30 April 2016, joel ahumuza <ahm.joel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alexandre,
>>>
>>> Unfortunately the filters are not helping, the flaps are still present 😞.
>>> Still looking for ways to mitigate this issue.
>>>
>>>> On 29 April 2016 at 11:14, joel ahumuza <ahm.joel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> Aaron,
>>>> Not all ldp interfaces are /32, my loopbacks are /32s other interfaces
>>>> attached to the ldp process are p2p links with /31 masks.
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre,
>>>> Thank you, I have applied the filters to our devices. I will monitor and
>>>> advise.
>>>>
>>>> On 28 April 2016 at 23:43, Alexandre Guimaraes <
>>>> alexandre.guimaraes at ascenty.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Had experienced the same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> After adding this to the loopback filter, the problem gone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> set firewall family inet filter PROTECT-RE term aceita-ldp from
>>> protocol
>>>>> tcp
>>>>> set firewall family inet filter PROTECT-RE term aceita-ldp from
>>> protocol
>>>>> udp
>>>>> set firewall family inet filter PROTECT-RE term aceita-ldp from
>>>>> source-port 646
>>>>> set firewall family inet filter PROTECT-RE term aceita-ldp from
>>>>> destination-port 646
>>>>> set firewall family inet filter PROTECT-RE term aceita-ldp then accept
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Mensagem original-----
>>>>> De: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] Em nome
>>> de
>>>>> joel ahumuza
>>>>> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 28 de abril de 2016 12:38
>>>>> Para: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>> Cc: tech at roketelkom.co.ug
>>>>> Assunto: [j-nsp] LDP flaps specifically present on ACX Juniper routers
>>>>> (ACX4000 and ACX1100)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> We are experiencing an issue with ACX routers running on 12.3X54-D20.7
>>>>> where the LDP sessions are continuously flapping, the logs indicate the
>>>>> following;
>>>>>
>>>>> Apr 21 03:36:31 hostname rpd[2299]: RPD_LDP_SESSIONDOWN: LDP session
>>>>> x.x.x.x is down, reason: hold time expired Apr 21 03:36:34 hostname
>>>>> rpd[2299]: RPD_LDP_NBRDOWN: LDP neighbor x.x.x.x
>>>>> (lo0.0) is down
>>>>> Apr 21 03:36:38 hostname rpd[2299]: RPD_LDP_NBRDOWN: LDP neighbor
>>> x.x.x.x
>>>>> (lo0.0) is down
>>>>> Apr 21 03:36:38 hostname rpd[2299]: RPD_LDP_SESSIONDOWN: LDP session
>>>>> x.x.x.x is down, reason: all adjacencies down Apr 21 03:55:34 hostname
>>>>> rpd[2299]: RPD_LDP_SESSIONDOWN: LDP session x.x.x.x is down, reason:
>>>>> received notification from peer Apr 21 03:55:34 hostname rpd[2299]:
>>>>> RPD_LDP_SESSIONDOWN: LDP session x.x.x.x is down, reason: received
>>>>> notification from peer Apr 21 03:55:35 hostname rpd[2299]:
>>>>> RPD_LDP_SESSIONDOWN: LDP session x.x.x.x is down, reason: received
>>>>> notification from peer Apr 21 03:55:35 hostname rpd[2299]:
>>>>> RPD_LDP_SESSIONDOWN: LDP session x.x.x.x is down, reason: received
>>>>> notification from peer
>>>>>
>>>>> The physical connections are okay, no flaps or errors on the p2p
>>>>> connections We are running ISIS as the IGP, whose adjacency is stable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actions taken from our team was;
>>>>> - Increase the hold time setting on the ldp enabled interfaces.
>>>>> - Increase the time interval on the same ldp enabled interfaces.
>>>>> - setting the ldp session protection setting on the ldp enabled
>>> loopback
>>>>> interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately the actions did not yield much since the flaps have been
>>>>> ongoing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone have any Idea on what the problem / solution might be?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Blessings,
>>>>>
>>>>> AJ.
>>>>> SkypeID - jl.hmz
>>>>> ahumuza-joel.blogspot.ug
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Blessings,
>>>>
>>>> AJ.
>>>> SkypeID - jl.hmz
>>>> ahumuza-joel.blogspot.ug
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Blessings,
>>>
>>> AJ.
>>> SkypeID - jl.hmz
>>> ahumuza-joel.blogspot.ug
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Enviado do Gmail para celular
>
>
>
> --
> Blessings,
>
> AJ.
> SkypeID - jl.hmz
> ahumuza-joel.blogspot.ug
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list