[j-nsp] Juniper ACX

Theo Voss mail at theo-voss.de
Tue Feb 9 10:32:54 EST 2016


Hi Johan,

we’re using ACX1100 and ACX500 as CPE device at customers sites with L2VPN which is working well. VPLS is (currently) not supported and the ACX1100 has a weird insufficiency, you can’t protect your lo0 (control plane) with a firewall filter, see KB28893. This issue is fixed on the ACX500 platform, tested with a loan device.

Cheers,
Theo


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> im Auftrag von Johan Borch <johan.borch at gmail.com>
Datum: Dienstag, 9. Februar 2016 um 16:10
An: "juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net" <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Betreff: [j-nsp] Juniper ACX

Hi!

I'm trying to find out more information about junipers ACX series, their
web is kind of sparse.

Would ACX-series be a good box for L2VPN terminations? I can't find any
information that VPLS is supported yet, seems to be supported in some 15..
version. Anyone with experience with for example filter/policy BUM traffic
and BPDUs? Do it have good control plane protection possibilities, similtar
to MX and not like EX.

Johan
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list