[j-nsp] Optimizing the FIB on MX

[Sebastian Becker]

Hi Ytti / Colton,

ASR9001-RP
cisco ASR9K Series (P4040) processor with 8388608K bytes of memory.
P4040 processor at 1500MHz, Revision 3.0

This box ist only available as SE (service enhanced) version.

A9K-RSP440-SE
cisco ASR9K Series (Intel 686 F6M14S4) processor with 12582912K bytes of memory.
Intel 686 F6M14S4 processor at 2135MHz, Revision 2.174

There is a TR (transport) version with half the memory:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-9000-series-aggregation-services-routers/data_sheet_c78-674143.html

A9K-RSP880-SE
cisco ASR9K Series (Intel 686 F6M14S4) processor with 33554432K bytes of memory.
Intel 686 F6M14S4 processor at 1904MHz, Revision 2.174

There is a TR (transport) version with half the memory:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/routers/asr-9000-series-aggregation-services-routers/datasheet-c78-733763.html

As AS9001 and AS9006/9010 have a different cpu architecture as MX104 and MX240/480/960 the comparison is not easy just by the type of the cpu itself. 

-- 
Sebastian Becker
sb at lab.dtag.de

> Am 18.02.2016 um 16:06 schrieb Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>:
> 
> 
> On 18 February 2016 at 16:21, Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hey Colton,
> 
>> What processor is in the Cisco 9001, and how does it compare to a MX104 in
>> terms of speed and BGP Performance?
> 
> ASR9001 is P4040 on RP, lower single core performance than MX104
> P5021. But the problem this thread addresses is not a problem IOS-XR
> has.
> 
>> What about a Cisco 9010 ASR9K Route Switch Processor with 440G/slot Fabric
>> and 6GB?
> 
> RSP440 is 4 core Intel, at about 2GHz. I'm actually sure which
> specific Intel CPU.
> 
> -- 
>  ++ytti
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp