[j-nsp] Optimizing the FIB on MX
Sebastian Becker
sb at lab.dtag.de
Thu Feb 18 11:23:43 EST 2016
Hi Ytti,
I meant 9001 to 9010 and mx104 to mx240.
cpu to cpu works, but than there is the software you mentioned.
Back to Juniper. ;-)
--
Sebastian Becker
sb at lab.dtag.de
> Am 18.02.2016 um 16:39 schrieb Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>:
>
>
> On 18 February 2016 at 17:29, Sebastian Becker <sb at lab.dtag.de> wrote:
>
> Hey Sebastian,
>
>> As AS9001 and AS9006/9010 have a different cpu architecture as MX104 and MX240/480/960 the comparison is not easy just by the type of the cpu itself.
>
> ASR9001 and MX104 use same Freescale QorIQ family, so it's very direct
> comparison. Specsheets are publically available.
> Larger MX and ASR9k use Intel X86/AMD64, so easy to compare.
>
> But of course the software is very different, and this MX104 issue
> thread is about, does not exist in IOS-XR, regardless how slow CPU it
> is rocking.
>
> --
> ++ytti
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list