[j-nsp] mixed interface, switching + routed

[Hugo Slabbert]

On Tue 2016-Jul-05 13:23:38 -0500, Josh Reynolds <josh at kyneticwifi.com> wrote:

>EX4500

This would be done with flexible-ethernet-services on MX, but I don't 
believe it's supported to mix L2 and L3 on the same port on the EX4500.  
We've tried that on 4550, and you can't mix family ethernet-switching with 
e.g. vlan-tagging, which is what you would use for your L3 unit.

You could change the interface into a trunk, run your existing access vlan 
as native, and create an RVI for your L3 interface, but that may or may not 
cut it depending on what you need that L3 interface for.

-- 
Hugo Slabbert       | email, xmpp/jabber: hugo at slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E   | also on Signal

>
>On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo at slabnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue 2016-Jul-05 13:17:52 -0500, Josh Reynolds <josh at kyneticwifi.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm sure this is a fairly basic question, but I'm having trouble
>>> finding a solution.
>>>
>>> I have a port that is currently an ethernet switching port, set in
>>> access mode that is tagging a vlan for upstream. This works fine. What
>>> I'd like to do, is add a sub interface on the master port (say, unit
>>> 600 / vlan 600) that is a tagged/routed interface.
>>>
>>> I've tried to do this a couple of ways now, and every time I seem to
>>> get thrown a different error.
>>>
>>> Anybody have any tips?
>>
>>
>> Support for this varies depending on what platform you are using.  You
>> haven't told us what equipment you're talking about.
>>
>>> Thanks :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20160705/006678e8/attachment.sig>