[j-nsp] MX104 capabilities question

Saku Ytti saku at ytti.fi
Wed Jun 8 11:20:53 EDT 2016

On 8 June 2016 at 17:58, Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
> Would anyone consider putting a ACX5048 in place of a MX104/ASR9k ?

Be sure you're happy with FIB size, with ACL size, ACL features
(ipv4+ipv6, at the same time), control-plane protection etc. ACX
across the board is pretty good, if you can live with the compromises
made. I often find I can't.


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list