[j-nsp] MX104 capabilities question

Tim Jackson jackson.tim at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 11:58:05 EDT 2016


It can't hold a full table in it's FIB for sure, but in the RIB it's fine:

inet.0: 588286 destinations, 1091804 routes (588284 active, 0 holddown, 2
hidden)

--
Tim

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Let me test this claim that an acx5048 cannot hold a full bgp
> table…… anyone know a way to get a test bgp session for a full feed ?
>
>
>
> -Aaron
>
>
>
>
>
> “I think the big thing the ACX5048 is lacking is the ability to hold a
> full routing table compared to the MX104 and ASR9001. Remember the ACX5048
> has a Broadcom Trident II chipset.”
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list