[j-nsp] SRX Active/Active

[Aaron Dewell]

> On Jun 27, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Hugo Slabbert <hugo at slabnet.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun 2016-Jun-26 20:51:41 -0700, Brian Spade <bitkraft at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alexandre,
>> 
>> Thanks for all the details.  I will check with our Juniper team and see
>> what's the latest on A/A vs A/P.  For most of our sites, we plan to just
>> use A/P.  But for the largest sites with multi-10Gbps egress, we want to
>> try A/A.
> 
> Aside from the other option listed of splitting the cluster into separate nodes, if your goal is multi-10G egress, you could also LAG 10G interfaces on the SRX northbound.  The config isn't super intuitive, but you can LAG reth child members in an A/P setup.


It’s not that bad.  It’s just keeping in mind that it’s really two LAGs, one to each cluster member.  So it’s configured twice on the switch, but only once on the SRX cluster.  Odd, but it makes sense in the end.