[j-nsp] B-RAS services

[Jason Warren]

Honestly 10G interfaces is not needed now nor anytime soon but would be nice to have the option down the road. The current router is acting as B-RAS and a VLAN router on 3 interfaces. I'm only pushing 400-500MB per physical interface. The main reason for the upgrade is to refresh the age of the underlying hardware. 

      From: Giuliano Medalha <giuliano at wztech.com.br>
 To: Jason Warren <tikitaru at yahoo.com> 
Cc: "juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net" <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
 Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 1:55 PM
 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] B-RAS services
   
Would be better to buy MX104 instead of MX80.

Do you need 10G interfaces or not ? 

If you need only 20 x 1G SFP is better option to use MX104 (MX5 option) because of 4GB DRAM option.

Do not forget the to buy SSM license (for CoA) optional ok ?

Att,

Giuliano





Giuliano Cardozo Medalha
Systems Engineer
+55 (17) 3011-3811+55 (17) 98112-5394
JUNIPER J-PARTNER ELITE
giuliano at wztech.com.br
http://www.wztech.com.br/



​WZTECH is registered trademark of WZTECH NETWORKS.
Copyright © 2016 WZTECH NETWORKS. All Rights Reserved.

IMPORTANTE:
As informações deste e-mail e o conteúdo dos  eventuais  documentos anexos são confidenciais e para conhecimento exclusivo do destinatário. Se o leitor  desta  mensagem  não  for o seu destinatário, 
fica desde já notificado de que não poderá  divulgar,  distribuir ou, sob qualquer forma, dar conhecimento a terceiros das informações e do conteúdo dos documentos anexos. Neste caso, favor comunicar imediatamente 
o remetente, respondendo este e-mail ou telefonando ao mesmo, e em seguida apague-o. 


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
The information transmitted in this email message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, transmission,  dissemination or other use of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer, including any copies.

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Jason Warren via juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> wrote:

I have a Cisco 7206VXR that I am wanting to replace with a Juniper MX80 (purchased as an MX5) or similar. The main core function is just Ethernet routing... but it also is acting as a B-RAS router for about 400 PPPoE sessions. I know the license cost on the MX80 for subscriber services is close to $15k.. which honestly puts it out of budget and pushes me back to a re-manufactured Cisco ASR.. Does anyone have some recommendations as to how to pull this off in a Juniper world? I was told by a VAR that on some of the larger Juniper chassis, this is not an issue as it is commonly included but unfortunately he was not positive which chassis this would be. 
My current thought is to maybe put a Cisco 7301 to service this function if nothing else...
Thank you in advance for any experience and advice anyone can offer!
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp