[j-nsp] BFD/IS-IS wait to re-establish adjacency after failure tweak knob?

[Saku Ytti]

On 19 May 2016 at 12:38, Adam Vitkovsky <Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk> wrote:

> /rant/
> I don’t understand why BFD can't be configured as a standalone protocol under protocols stanza same way as oam lfm is.
> Something like the below.
> set protocols bfd interface ae0 pdu-interval 100
> set protocols bfd interface ae0 pdu-threshold 3
> set protocols bfd interface ae0 apply-action-profile put-link-to-a-rest
> set protocols bfd action-profile put-link-to-a-rest event link-adjacency-loss
> set protocols bfd action-profile put-link-to-a-rest action link-down
> /rant/

+1 why create higher abstraction layers and complicated notifications
per protocols, when usually if we need single-hop BFD, we need it
because we broke physical liveliness detection

-- 
  ++ytti