[j-nsp] ISIS route leaking from Level2 to Level1

Krzysztof Szarkowicz kszarkowicz at gmail.com
Fri Nov 18 08:13:14 EST 2016


Hi Cydon,

setting down bit will be supported from 16.2 with ‘then color2 1’


Best regards,
Krzysztof 




> On 2016-Nov-18, at 14:08, Cydon Satyr <cydonsatyr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Krasimir,
> 
> I'm aware that would work. Also, if aggregate is redistributed to level 2
> as well (not just level 1), the originating router will not install this
> route into RIB - but I was sure this behavior would work if route is
> distributed into level 1 only as well.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Krasimir Avramski <krasi at smartcom.bg>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Cydon,
>> 
>> Lower the aggregatde route preference below 18.
>> 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Krasi
>> 
>> On 18 November 2016 at 13:11, Cydon Satyr <cydonsatyr at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello experts,
>>> 
>>> If I create an aggregate route on L1/2 router and export it to Level1 ("to
>>> level 1"), this route does not have up/down bit set, making it eligible
>>> for
>>> leaking back to Level 2.
>>> What happens is that now router which originated aggregated route prefers
>>> same route over ISIS making a constant oscillation.
>>> 
>>> Is there a way to prevent this?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list