[j-nsp] SRX1500 and transceiver support

Richard Hesse richard.hesse at weebly.com
Fri Oct 7 18:41:41 EDT 2016


Third party twinax/DAC works fine.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Michael Gehrmann <mgehrmann at atlassian.com>
wrote:

> Hi Tim,
>
> Is there any impact to traffic/packets? I'm planning on using 3rd party
> twinax in a new build soon.
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
> On 3 October 2016 at 03:32, Timothy Creswick <timothy at creswick.eu> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Is anyone seeing issues with 3rd party transceivers on the SRX1500
> > platform? We've already encountered PR1191710** and updated to
> 15.1X49-D60
> > accordingly.
> >
> > Using identical optics (and coding) that we have successfully used in
> > previous generation SRXs and/or MXs we are now seeing a variety of
> issues,
> > including what appears to be a case of the chassis actually altering the
> > transceiver EEPROM. In short, we don't have anything stable and the box
> > appears to actively prohibit the use of 3rd party transceivers (as
> distinct
> > from not officially supporting them).
> >
> > We're talking to our SE about this but they don't seem to have many of
> > these deployed yet.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> > ** "On SRX1500 platform. when a SFP(SRX-SFP-1GE-SX) transceiver is
> plugged
> > into a SFP port, it works well. However, when it is plugged into a SFP+
> > ports, it shows as UNSUPPORTED"
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Gehrmann
> Senior Network Engineer - Atlassian
> m: +61 407 570 658
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list