[j-nsp] SRX 300 stability and potential issues

[Johannes Resch]

I've deployed a number of SRX3xx devices, with good results.
Features I've used on that platform include OSPF, IPsec S2S VPN,
L2-transparent mode, clustering. Some of the devices are now in production
for 3+ months, running stable and no issues seen so far.

When migrating from SRX1xx/2xx, you might want to double-check that the
features you've been using on the old branch SRX devices are
(still|already) available on SRX3xx/15.1X49 code as well.

cheers,
-jr

On 27 September 2016 at 16:40, Robert Hass <robhass at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
> I'm wondering about adding new SRX 300 devices to existing network
> deployment. Our current network is using SRX100 and SRX240 in branches.
>
> As SRX100/SRX240 are EoS we need to deploy latest SRX300 devices.
> They're really fresh so my question is how stable are they ? Any
> experiences ?
>
> We will use DMVPN, OSPF, IPS/NGFW application inspection.
>
> Rob
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>