[j-nsp] vlan-ccc between ACX5048 and EX4500

Pavel Lunin plunin at gmail.com
Wed Aug 23 17:32:25 EDT 2017


Yes, EX4500/4550 chipset is not able to treat any additional tags of the
MPLS packet.

IIRC, they "officially support" (whatever it means) pseudowires and VPLS in
EX4550 to EX4550 mode only thus it's nowhere documented that it pops the
vlan tag by default and can't treat the control world.

23 авг. 2017 г. 11:16 PM пользователь "Jay Hanke" <jayhanke at gmail.com>
написал:

> Setting the control word worked right away. Is the issue lack of
> support of the control word on one of the sides?
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Pavel Lunin <plunin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Try to add no-control-world under your l2circuit/neighbor/interface
> config
> > on both sides (as well the VLAN push/pop on the ACX side).
> >
> > 2017-08-23 15:16 GMT+02:00 Jay Hanke <jayhanke at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> No luck. Here is the config I tried
> >>
> >> unit 517 {
> >>     encapsulation vlan-ccc;
> >>     vlan-id 517;
> >>     input-vlan-map pop;
> >>     output-vlan-map push;
> >> }
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Enoch Nyatoti <enyatoti at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Can you try the following on your ACX5048 interface:
> >> >
> >> > set interfaces xe-0/0/46.517 input-vlan-map pop
> >> > set interfaces xe-0/0/46.517 output-vlan-map push
> >> >
> >> > Best regards
> >> > Enoch Nyatoti
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wednesday, August 23, 2017, 7:51:21 AM GMT+1, Jay Hanke
> >> > <jayhanke at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I'm having an issue where I'm unable to pass traffic through a
> >> > vlan-ccc between an ACX5048 and an EX4500. Other circuits on same
> >> > boxes are working fine. The other circuits are ACX to ACX and EX to
> >> > EX.
> >> >
> >> > PE1 (ex4500)
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > l2circuit {
> >> >     neighbor 10.200.xx.xy {
> >> >         interface xe-0/0/1.517 {
> >> >             virtual-circuit-id 10000171;
> >> >             mtu 9000;
> >> >             encapsulation-type ethernet-vlan;
> >> >         }
> >> >     }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > xe-0/0/1 {
> >> >     vlan-tagging;
> >> >     mtu 9216;
> >> >     encapsulation vlan-ccc;
> >> >     unit 517 {
> >> >         encapsulation vlan-ccc;
> >> >         vlan-id 517;
> >> >     }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > PE2 (ACX5048):
> >> >
> >> > l2circuit {
> >> >     neighbor 10.200.xx.xx {
> >> >         interface xe-0/0/46.517 {
> >> >             virtual-circuit-id 10000171;
> >> >             mtu 9000;
> >> >             encapsulation-type ethernet-vlan;
> >> >         }
> >> >     }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > xe-0/0/46 {
> >> >
> >> >     vlan-tagging;
> >> >     mtu 9216;
> >> >     encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
> >> >
> >> >     unit 517 {
> >> >         encapsulation vlan-ccc;
> >> >         vlan-id 517;
> >> >     }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > I'm learning mac-addresses through the link on the PE2 side.
> >> >
> >> > The interface connected on the PE1 side doesn't learn anything.
> >> >
> >> > show l2circuit con shows the PW up on both PE devices.
> >> >
> >> > I've reloaded software on the EX4500 with the same result. There is
> >> > one P router between the PE devices.
> >> >
> >> > All my existing PW are between EX4500 or between ACX. We don't have
> >> > any working between systems with different models acting as PE
> >> > devices. But quite a few working where PE devices are the same type.
> >> >
> >> > Any ideas?
> >> >
> >> > Jay
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> >
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list