[j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

Catalin Dominte catalin.dominte at nocsult.net
Fri Dec 1 13:09:39 EST 2017


MX104 has 4gb Memory and MX80 comes with 2. If you are running full BGP
tables, you might want to consider this too.


*Catalin Dominte | Senior Network Consultant*

Nocsult Ltd  | 11 Castle Hill  |  Maidenhead  |  Berkshire  |  SL6 4AA  |
 Phone:  +44 (0)1628 302 007

VAT registration number: GB 180957674  |  Company registration number:
08886349
P Please consider the environment - Do you really need to print this email?

THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
its attachments from all computers.

On 1 December 2017 at 18:03:15, Alain Hebert (ahebert at pubnix.net) wrote:

    Hi,

    Beside the extra RE-slot of the 104 and a few more slots.


    Is there any more drawback (beside the knowned hella slow RE which
is the same as the 104) of opting for the MX80?

    It looks like 4 10Gb XFP + 2 slot of 2 10Gb XFP is the maximum in
the 80 case.  Which will be viable for the project.


    PS: With a small budget, and they're buying 2 boxes anyway... and
they're not interested in MS-MIC

-- 
-----
Alain Hebert ahebert at pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list