[j-nsp] MX80 v MX104

Colton Conor colton.conor at gmail.com
Sat Dec 2 09:44:14 EST 2017


I was about to say check out the MX204 or MX150 if it meets the need. These
are newer boxes.

Anyone have an idea what the list price is for both of these boxes? Do they
have locked features, or special upgrades like the MX5-80 had?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Raphael Maunier <raphael at zoreole.com>
wrote:

> Go for MX204 : https://www.juniper.net/us/en/products-services/routing/mx-
> series/mx204/
>
> RFS 02/2018
>
> Raphael
>
> On 01/12/2017 19:42, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Jerry Jones" <
> juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of jjones at danrj.com> wrote:
>
>     Go with MX104
>
>     Form factor much better. nothing on the back, have option for second
> RE if desired, RE is slightly better, 2 more MIC slots, cost is generally
> less on 104 than 80, if using ay 10G then it for sure should be, and if I
> remember correct 104 is quieter, but have not played on 80 for some timen
> ow as ony use 104s for last couple years
>
>
>     On Dec 1, 2017, at 12:09 PM, Catalin Dominte <
> catalin.dominte at nocsult.net> wrote:
>
>     MX104 has 4gb Memory and MX80 comes with 2. If you are running full BGP
>     tables, you might want to consider this too.
>
>
>     *Catalin Dominte | Senior Network Consultant*
>
>     Nocsult Ltd  | 11 Castle Hill  |  Maidenhead  |  Berkshire  |  SL6
> 4AA  |
>     Phone:  +44 (0)1628 302 007
>
>     VAT registration number: GB 180957674  |  Company registration number:
>     08886349
>     P Please consider the environment - Do you really need to print this
> email?
>
>     THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE
> PROPRIETARY
>     MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
>     received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the email
> and
>     its attachments from all computers.
>
>     On 1 December 2017 at 18:03:15, Alain Hebert (ahebert at pubnix.net)
> wrote:
>
>        Hi,
>
>        Beside the extra RE-slot of the 104 and a few more slots.
>
>
>        Is there any more drawback (beside the knowned hella slow RE which
>     is the same as the 104) of opting for the MX80?
>
>        It looks like 4 10Gb XFP + 2 slot of 2 10Gb XFP is the maximum in
>     the 80 case.  Which will be viable for the project.
>
>
>        PS: With a small budget, and they're buying 2 boxes anyway... and
>     they're not interested in MS-MIC
>
>     --
>     -----
>     Alain Hebert ahebert at pubnix.net
>     PubNIX Inc.
>     50 boul. St-Charles
>     P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
>     Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>     _______________________________________________
>     juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list