[j-nsp] Going Juniper
Mark Tinka
mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Sun Apr 22 05:59:08 EDT 2018
IPv6? Or am I at risk of lighting a fire :-)?
Mark.
On 21/Apr/18 21:55, Aaron Gould wrote:
> $5-10 per ip ?! Buy it now!
>
> I was propositioned just this week about my letting go of a /17 for half a million dollars ! that's about $15/per ip
>
> My MX104 with MX-MIC-16G were about $25k
>
> I bought 2 and put ~6,000 dsl customers behind them
>
> I'm so glad I did
>
> -Aaron
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of mike+jnsp at willitsonline.com
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 6:37 PM
> To: borss at pobox.com
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Going Juniper
>
>
>
> On 04/13/2018 02:30 PM, borss at pobox.com wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Apr 2018, mike+jnsp at willitsonline.com wrote:
>>
>>> Id even like to do cgnat for up to 5000 users but not sure if a
>>> single box setup would be wise.
>> I'm curious why you and other service providers are interested in
>> CGNAT when IPv4 addresses are still relatively cheap to buy. In many
>> cases, even the hard costs of CGNAT are less thant what the needed
>> IPv4 addresses cost, let alone the large operational costs of
>> supporting users behind NATS, so I'm guessing your motivations aren't
>> about cost, is that right?
>>
> Cheap... hmm... $5 - $10/each is not cheap, but at that level, nat is
> like printing money. Now, if someone had a /20 for closer to $1/ea,
> maybe... but what I know of that market is, forget it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> .
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list