[j-nsp] QFX5110 / VXLAN

[Richard McGovern]

Correct.  For this functionality one needs either a 10K/MXPTX or EX9200 at current time.  These situations may also require EVPN-MPLS, versus EVPN-VXLAN.  QFX5110 is limited to EVPN-VXLAN at least today.  QFX5100 provide L2 only EVPN-VXLAN.

Thanks for pointing this out.

On 8/6/18, 12:40 PM, "Mike Gonnason" <gonnason at gmail.com> wrote:

    Be aware on the QFX5110 that L3 VXLAN is limited, You cannot route vxlan to
    vlan:
    https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=prcontent&id=PR1318178
    
    
    
    On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:51 PM Brant Ian Stevens <
    branto at argentiumsolutions.com> wrote:
    
    > And now there's the announcement of the QFX5120 and EX4650 to the mix.
    > Those are Trident-3 based, if I am not mistaken.  Boxes look great on
    > paper...
    >
    > --
    > Regards,
    > --
    > Brant I. Stevens, Principal & Consulting Architect
    > branto at argentiumsolutions.com
    > d:212.931.8566, x101 <(212)%20931-8566>. m:917.673.6536 <(917)%20673-6536>.
    > f:917.525.4759 <(917)%20525-4759>.
    > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__argentiumsolutions.com&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=OmeaqZQV835ARTQIMsk32-c0AQ4PSf50LLpVss0TzuM&e=
    >
    > On 7/4/18 5:03 PM, Scott Harvanek wrote:
    > > Cost is a factor I don’t think I can get anyone to bite on something
    > bigger either as the application is solely VXLAN in a compact form factor.
    > >
    > > -Scott H
    > >
    > >> On Jul 4, 2018, at 2:20 PM, Pavel Lunin <plunin at gmail.com> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> Btw, it's a very good question if anyone here has more or less close to
    > real-world experience with L3 gw and evpn type 5 routes on QFX5110 or maybe
    > any other trident 2+ based box.
    > >>
    > >> Would much appreciate your input.
    > >>
    > >> Regards,
    > >> Pavel
    > >>
    > >> July 3, 2018, 18:48 Roger Wiklund <roger.wiklund at gmail.com>:
    > >>> Hi Scott
    > >>>
    > >>> Should be fine as L2 GW. L3 GW and Route Type 5 support is quite
    > recent.
    > >>>
    > >>> Beefier alternatives are QFX10002, or MX204 if you want to go MX route
    > with
    > >>> fewer ports. Both have custom ASICs with higher scale, and higher
    > chance to
    > >>> overcome caveats/limitations especially tied to chipset limitation.
    > >>>
    > >>> Regards
    > >>> Roger
    > >>>
    > >>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Scott Harvanek <
    > scott.harvanek at login.com>
    > >>> wrote:
    > >>>
    > >>>> Is anyone on here running 5110s for VXLAN/VTEP/EVPN and run into any
    > >>>> issues?  I’ve gone over the caveats list Juniper has for these in
    > regards
    > >>>> to what they won’t do in regards to VXLAN and it seems like they meet
    > our
    > >>>> needs… just curious if anyone has run into any lesser documented
    > issues
    > >>>> with them.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> I’m looking at the list here; https://www.juniper.net/
    > >>>>
    > documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-constraints-qfx-series.html
    > >>>> <
    > https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-
    > >>>> constraints-qfx-series.html>
    > >>>>
    > >>>> Is there a better device for VXLAN on the juniper side? We’re looking
    > for
    > >>>> something comparable to the Nexus 9372 on the Cisco side.
    > >>>>
    > >>>> Cheers!
    > >>>>
    > >>>> Scott H
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>>
    > >>>> _______________________________________________
    > >>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
    > >>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e=
    > >>>>
    > >>> _______________________________________________
    > >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
    > >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e=
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
    > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e=
    > _______________________________________________
    > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
    > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-2Dnsp&d=DwIFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=cViNvWbwxCvdnmDGDIbWYLiUsu8nisqLYXmd-x445bc&m=eVWy_z1Tt_vOBqrVgHiM_dtKdycFG7efWLRFNxJndQk&s=yjHoZdiJRmtZlTtQ9QIzFlqKEkKQX5MxD-94nTWLrWs&e=
    >