[j-nsp] Apply-group brain fart

Balasankar Rajaguru balasank at juniper.net
Mon Aug 27 03:27:56 EDT 2018


Hi Tom, 

> Ive tried defining the st0 interface and unit 1 within the interfaces stanza, but
> that didnt help. What am I missing? What can I look at? Am I trying to do
> something that simply cant be done?

Does the issue happens when the same config is configured in foreground under
Interface stanza without the apply-groups config.

Regards,
Balasankar

> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Tom
> Storey
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 3:35 PM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Apply-group brain fart
> 
> Hi everyone. I am trying to build some configuration groups with the intention of
> keeping related configuration for some IPSEC VPNs etc nicely contained in one
> spot - define all relevant configuration in a group and apply it in one go, and also
> remove it *all* when you delete and remove the configuration group. This way,
> hopefully, little bits and pieces dont get left behind as VPNs are set up and torn
> down, ideally maintaining a cleaner configuration.
> 
> But I have an odd situation. I am working with a cluster of SRX345, and it seems
> that when ever I apply a config group with an st interface defined, my default
> route disappears and some connected routes seem to disappear or change from
> local to reject, and I lose the ability to manage the cluster via SSH and have to
> use the console. The same does not happen on a standalone SRX110.
> 
> For example, prior to applying the configuration, my routing table looks
> like:
> 
> 0.0.0.0/0          *[Static/5] 16:51:49
>                     > to 10.32.31.1 via reth2.0
> 10.32.31.0/24      *[Direct/0] 16:51:49
>                     > via reth2.0
> 10.32.31.230/32    *[Local/0] 16w6d 23:56:30
>                       Local via reth2.0
> 10.32.31.231/32    *[Static/1] 6d 22:02:40
>                       Receive
> 100.64.0.0/24      *[Direct/0] 16:51:49
>                     > via reth3.0
> 100.64.0.1/32      *[Local/0] 1w0d 19:43:19
>                       Local via reth3.0
> 
> And after applying the apply group:
> 
> 10.32.31.230/32    *[Local/0] 16w6d 23:58:13
>                       Reject
> 10.32.31.231/32    *[Static/1] 6d 22:04:23
>                       Receive
> 100.64.0.1/32      *[Local/0] 1w0d 19:45:02
>                       Reject
> 100.64.255.0/30    *[Direct/0] 00:00:04
>                     > via st0.1
> 100.64.255.1/32    *[Local/0] 00:00:04
>                       Local via st0.1
> 
> The very simple configuration group that I have defined is (I removed a lot of it
> during debugging, and this is all that is left):
> 
> groups {
>     EXAMPLE-VPN {
>         interfaces {
>             st0 {
>                 unit 1 {
>                     description "DCN VPN to srx110:st0.0";
>                     family inet {
>                         address 100.64.255.1/30;
>                     }
>                 }
>             }
>         }
>     }
> }
> 
> I set this with:
> 
> {primary:node0}[edit]
> root at node0-srx345# set apply-groups EXAMPLE-VPN
> 
> Pretty straight forward I thought...
> 
> In the configuration, after the commit has completed (no complaints) I do see
> my st0 configuration inherited, and all of the configuration for my reth
> interfaces is also inherited, and show int terse shows them all there with their IP
> addresses.
> 
> # show interfaces | display inheritance
> ...
> reth2 {
>     description UNTRUST;
>     ##
>     ## 'redundant-ether-options' was inherited from group 'SRX34X-CLUSTER'
>     ##
>     redundant-ether-options {
>         ##
>         ## '1' was inherited from group 'SRX34X-CLUSTER'
>         ##
>         redundancy-group 1;
>     }
>     unit 0 {
>         family inet {
>             address 10.32.31.230/24;
>         }
>     }
> }
> reth3 {
>     description "AVAILABLE - Parent for ge-[05]/0/3";
>     ##
>     ## 'redundant-ether-options' was inherited from group 'SRX34X-CLUSTER'
>     ##
>     redundant-ether-options {
>         ##
>         ## '1' was inherited from group 'SRX34X-CLUSTER'
>         ##
>         redundancy-group 1;
>     }
>     unit 0 {
>         family inet {
>             address 100.64.0.1/24;
>         }
>     }
> }
> ...
> ##
> ## 'st0' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
> ##
> st0 {
>     ##
>     ## '1' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
>     ##
>     unit 1 {
>         ##
>         ## 'DCN VPN to srx110:st0.0' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
>         ##
>         description "DCN VPN to srx110:st0.0";
>         ##
>         ## 'inet' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
>         ##
>         family inet {
>             ##
>             ## '100.64.255.1/30' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
>             ##
>             address 100.64.255.1/30;
>         }
>     }
> }
> 
> So Im a bit struck as to what is going wrong here. The only smoking gun I see is
> that my reth subinterfaces appear to be "hardware down" with the parents
> claiming "physical link down" when the config group is applied.
> Remove it and everything returns to normal.
> 
> Ive tried defining the st0 interface and unit 1 within the interfaces stanza, but
> that didnt help. What am I missing? What can I look at? Am I trying to do
> something that simply cant be done?
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-
> 2Dnsp&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=d9gDdGNcoyIZFOkxOo1dADabVVg_rE5cKQZu_QMI8Hk&
> m=pbvoXfrsWWG2AejgZuYLRNCGz2KG0wDUO6hZEv3dwig&s=No81uUiLk860z8
> abg7QbrfxmkE862tvj2hO7m6VfdTc&e=


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list