[j-nsp] Apply-group brain fart
Balasankar Rajaguru
balasank at juniper.net
Mon Aug 27 03:27:56 EDT 2018
Hi Tom,
> Ive tried defining the st0 interface and unit 1 within the interfaces stanza, but
> that didnt help. What am I missing? What can I look at? Am I trying to do
> something that simply cant be done?
Does the issue happens when the same config is configured in foreground under
Interface stanza without the apply-groups config.
Regards,
Balasankar
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> On Behalf Of Tom
> Storey
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 3:35 PM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Apply-group brain fart
>
> Hi everyone. I am trying to build some configuration groups with the intention of
> keeping related configuration for some IPSEC VPNs etc nicely contained in one
> spot - define all relevant configuration in a group and apply it in one go, and also
> remove it *all* when you delete and remove the configuration group. This way,
> hopefully, little bits and pieces dont get left behind as VPNs are set up and torn
> down, ideally maintaining a cleaner configuration.
>
> But I have an odd situation. I am working with a cluster of SRX345, and it seems
> that when ever I apply a config group with an st interface defined, my default
> route disappears and some connected routes seem to disappear or change from
> local to reject, and I lose the ability to manage the cluster via SSH and have to
> use the console. The same does not happen on a standalone SRX110.
>
> For example, prior to applying the configuration, my routing table looks
> like:
>
> 0.0.0.0/0 *[Static/5] 16:51:49
> > to 10.32.31.1 via reth2.0
> 10.32.31.0/24 *[Direct/0] 16:51:49
> > via reth2.0
> 10.32.31.230/32 *[Local/0] 16w6d 23:56:30
> Local via reth2.0
> 10.32.31.231/32 *[Static/1] 6d 22:02:40
> Receive
> 100.64.0.0/24 *[Direct/0] 16:51:49
> > via reth3.0
> 100.64.0.1/32 *[Local/0] 1w0d 19:43:19
> Local via reth3.0
>
> And after applying the apply group:
>
> 10.32.31.230/32 *[Local/0] 16w6d 23:58:13
> Reject
> 10.32.31.231/32 *[Static/1] 6d 22:04:23
> Receive
> 100.64.0.1/32 *[Local/0] 1w0d 19:45:02
> Reject
> 100.64.255.0/30 *[Direct/0] 00:00:04
> > via st0.1
> 100.64.255.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:00:04
> Local via st0.1
>
> The very simple configuration group that I have defined is (I removed a lot of it
> during debugging, and this is all that is left):
>
> groups {
> EXAMPLE-VPN {
> interfaces {
> st0 {
> unit 1 {
> description "DCN VPN to srx110:st0.0";
> family inet {
> address 100.64.255.1/30;
> }
> }
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> I set this with:
>
> {primary:node0}[edit]
> root at node0-srx345# set apply-groups EXAMPLE-VPN
>
> Pretty straight forward I thought...
>
> In the configuration, after the commit has completed (no complaints) I do see
> my st0 configuration inherited, and all of the configuration for my reth
> interfaces is also inherited, and show int terse shows them all there with their IP
> addresses.
>
> # show interfaces | display inheritance
> ...
> reth2 {
> description UNTRUST;
> ##
> ## 'redundant-ether-options' was inherited from group 'SRX34X-CLUSTER'
> ##
> redundant-ether-options {
> ##
> ## '1' was inherited from group 'SRX34X-CLUSTER'
> ##
> redundancy-group 1;
> }
> unit 0 {
> family inet {
> address 10.32.31.230/24;
> }
> }
> }
> reth3 {
> description "AVAILABLE - Parent for ge-[05]/0/3";
> ##
> ## 'redundant-ether-options' was inherited from group 'SRX34X-CLUSTER'
> ##
> redundant-ether-options {
> ##
> ## '1' was inherited from group 'SRX34X-CLUSTER'
> ##
> redundancy-group 1;
> }
> unit 0 {
> family inet {
> address 100.64.0.1/24;
> }
> }
> }
> ...
> ##
> ## 'st0' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
> ##
> st0 {
> ##
> ## '1' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
> ##
> unit 1 {
> ##
> ## 'DCN VPN to srx110:st0.0' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
> ##
> description "DCN VPN to srx110:st0.0";
> ##
> ## 'inet' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
> ##
> family inet {
> ##
> ## '100.64.255.1/30' was inherited from group 'EXAMPLE-VPN'
> ##
> address 100.64.255.1/30;
> }
> }
> }
>
> So Im a bit struck as to what is going wrong here. The only smoking gun I see is
> that my reth subinterfaces appear to be "hardware down" with the parents
> claiming "physical link down" when the config group is applied.
> Remove it and everything returns to normal.
>
> Ive tried defining the st0 interface and unit 1 within the interfaces stanza, but
> that didnt help. What am I missing? What can I look at? Am I trying to do
> something that simply cant be done?
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__puck.nether.net_mailman_listinfo_juniper-
> 2Dnsp&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-
> ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=d9gDdGNcoyIZFOkxOo1dADabVVg_rE5cKQZu_QMI8Hk&
> m=pbvoXfrsWWG2AejgZuYLRNCGz2KG0wDUO6hZEv3dwig&s=No81uUiLk860z8
> abg7QbrfxmkE862tvj2hO7m6VfdTc&e=
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list