[j-nsp] RES: QFX5100 vs ACX5048

Gustavo Santos gustkiller at gmail.com
Mon Jul 2 10:08:53 EDT 2018


Alexandre,

The 15.1X54-D67.2   Fixed this issue for Us, and when I first got this
issue, they give us  a "workaround" that disabled the default arp policer
and solved the l2 circuits issues with arp packets.

On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 11:06 AM Alexandre Guimaraes <
alexandre.guimaraes at ascenty.com> wrote:

> Aaron,
> I am using 15.1X54-D51.7, I will try D61.6 version, Let´s see.
>
>                 I moved out all Carriers NNI almost 2 years ago and never
> change anymore since that fatidic day, now the impact will affect only
> ethernet l2circuits.
>
>
>
> --- JUNOS 15.1X54-D51.7 built 2016-08-22 17:14:59 UTC
> {master:0}
> > show system uptime
> fpc0:
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Current time: 2018-07-02 11:03:15 BRT
> .
> .
> .
> 11:03AM  up 647 days,  8:57, 1 user, load averages: 0.13, 0.10, 0.08
>
>
> Att
> Alexandre
>
> De: Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com>
> Enviada em: segunda-feira, 2 de julho de 2018 10:17
> Para: 'Giuliano C. Medalha' <giuliano at wztech.com.br>; Alexandre Guimaraes
> <alexandre.guimaraes at ascenty.com>
> Cc: 'Juniper List' <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Assunto: RE: [j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048
>
> ACX5048
>
> 15.1X54-D61.6
>
> - Aaron
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list