[j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048
Colton Conor
colton.conor at gmail.com
Wed Jul 11 08:24:16 EDT 2018
Nick,
Why does it say
*Resolved In* 16.2R1-S7 16.2R3 17.1R2 17.1R3 17.2R2 *17.3R1*
17.3R1 came before the now current JTAC recommend *17.3R2 right? *
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:39 AM, Nick Ryce <Nick.Ryce at commsworld.com> wrote:
> Sorry I thought I had.
>
>
>
> We hit this https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=
> prcontent&id=PR1280492
>
>
>
> This is being resolved in 17.3R3 which is due for release in a couple of
> weeks.
>
>
>
> N
>
>
>
> *From: *Colton Conor <colton.conor at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 11 July 2018 at 12:30
> *To: *Nick Ryce <Nick.Ryce at commsworld.com>
> *Cc: *Gustavo Santos <gustkiller at gmail.com>, Aaron <aaron1 at gvtc.com>,
> Juniper List <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048
>
>
>
> Nick,
>
>
>
> Did you find the PR for this memory leak?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Nick Ryce <Nick.Ryce at commsworld.com>
> wrote:
>
> If you use BFD, do not upgrade to 17.3R2 as there is a memory leak. Will
> find the PR.
>
> N
>
>
> On 04/07/2018, 15:31, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Colton Conor" <
> juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net on behalf of colton.conor at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Gustavo,
>
> We you say " Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC
> recommended that made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to
> find
> the physical ports..) We had to downgrade to get it back working
> again.."
> what version was this as JTAC recently changed their recommended
> version?
> It seem everyone on this thread is talking about software train
> 15.1X54.
>
> However, the current JTAC recommended version is Junos 17.3R2 as of 14
> May
> 2018. Why is everyone running 15.1X54 code?
>
> Has anyone upgraded to Junos 17.3R2 on the ACX's? No matter the
> model, all
> ACX's current recommended is now Junos 17.3R2
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Gustavo Santos <gustkiller at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I had some issues with ACX5048 , the most noticable was arp packets
> from
> > pure L2 vlans and VPLS punting to CPU and flooding the default arp
> policer
> > police..
> > JTAC was able to reproduce the issue and gave us an option to disable
> > default arp policer until they release a service release to fix this
> issue
> > that was solved indeed.
> >
> > Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC recommended
> that
> > made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find the physical
> > ports..) We had to downgrade to get it back working again..
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 8:05 PM Alexandre Guimaraes <
> > alexandre.guimaraes at ascenty.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Better in terms of concept. In term of usage, i still investing in
> qfx5100
> >>
> >> Acx5058 Suppose to be a promise of a new future, unfortunately,
> with all
> >> problematic of the qfx5100 hardware, the acx5048 leak vlan till the
> last
> >> breath of cpu.... after that, all deamons and services going
> down.... up
> >> and down, up and down.
> >>
> >> I never more brought one peace ACX5048 after jtac didnt responds
> why and
> >> solution for the leaking...( I have only two acx5048 and hundreds on
> >> QFX...).
> >>
> >> The new promise is the new acx5448. No vlan leaking, a good load
> >> balance(ae) algorithm, full of this.... full of that.... a lot of
> promise.
> >>
> >> Let’s see...
> >>
> >> att
> >> Alexandre
> >>
> >> Em 1 de jul de 2018, à(s) 19:31, Colton Conor <
> colton.conor at gmail.com>
> >> escreveu:
> >>
> >> > What is the main difference between these two boxes? Hardware
> wise they
> >> > look identical. Is there anything on the hardware side that makes
> the
> >> > ACX5048 better than a QFX5100, or is it only software related?
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list