[j-nsp] router reflector clients and non-clients

[Victor Sudakov]

Christopher E. Brown wrote:
> 
> Using different cluster-ids you end up with multiple copies of all the
> prefixes but done correctly it works just fine and provides better
> redundancy at the cost of higher "path" count.
> 
> If you are running single cluster-id and pushing router memory limits it
> would be a bad idea.
> 
> If you have the memory, dual RRs with different cluster-ids and
> multipath are not a bad thing.
> 
> Not like I have a fairly large network doing exactly that since 2011
> without issue.

Dear Christopher,

What do you mean by "done correctly" in this case?

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
AS43859