[j-nsp] Mixing v4/v6 neighbors in BGP groups

[Mark Tinka]

On 29/Jun/18 17:01, Rob Foehl wrote:

> Wondering aloud a bit...  I've seen plenty of cases where wedging
> parallel v4/v6 sessions into the same BGP group and letting the router
> sort out which AFI it's supposed to be using on each session works
> fine, and nearly as many where configuring anything family-specific
> starts to get ugly without splitting them into separate v4/v6 groups. 
> Are there any particularly compelling reasons to prefer one over the
> other?
>
> I can think of a bunch of reasons for and against on both sides, and
> several ways to handle it with apply-groups or commit scripts. 
> Curious what others are doing here.

I prefer not to find out whether walking on hot coal will kill all
feeling in my feet, or just numb them for 2hrs :-).

Mark.