[j-nsp] BGP EVPN, VXLAN and ECMP
Vincent Bernat
bernat at luffy.cx
Wed Mar 28 10:25:24 EDT 2018
Hey!
I am trying to setup a Juniper QFX5100 as a VTEP with a very classic
setup. Everything works as expected, but the setup is only using one
possible path from the underlay network.
I have the route to the other VTEP like this:
# run show route 10.16.39.3
inet.0: 240 destinations, 1808 routes (240 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10.16.39.3/32 *[BGP/140] 00:38:24, localpref 500, from 10.64.0.5
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
to 10.64.0.23 via xe-0/0/46.181
> to 10.64.128.23 via xe-0/0/47.183
[BGP/140] 00:38:24, localpref 500, from 10.64.128.6
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 10.64.128.23 via xe-0/0/47.183
[BGP/140] 00:38:24, localpref 500, from 10.64.0.3
AS path: I, validation-state: unverified
> to 10.64.0.23 via xe-0/0/46.181
:vxlan.inet.0: 17 destinations, 21 routes (17 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
10.16.39.3/32 *[Static/1] 00:31:10, metric2 0
> to 10.64.128.23 via xe-0/0/47.183
So, from an IP point of view, I have two available routes to the other
VTEP. In the :vxlan.inet.0 table, only one route is kept. I suppose the
problem is at this point.
Looking at the forwarding table, I have only one indirect next-hop too:
# show route forwarding-table family ethernet-switching bridge-domain vlan-client1-543 extensive
Routing table: default-switch.bridge [Index 4]
Bridging domain: vlan-client1-543.bridge [Index 3]
VPLS:
Enabled protocols: Bridging, ACKed by all peers,
[...]
Destination: 0a:e3:40:00:00:d9/48
Learn VLAN: 0 Route type: user
Route reference: 0 Route interface-index: 575
Multicast RPF nh index: 0
P2mpidx: 0
IFL generation: 142 Epoch: 0
Sequence Number: 0 Learn Mask: 0x4000000000000000000000000000000000000000
L2 Flags: control_dyn
Flags: sent to PFE
Next-hop type: composite Index: 2045 Reference: 6
Next-hop type: indirect Index: 131317 Reference: 3
Nexthop: 10.64.128.23
Next-hop type: unicast Index: 1928 Reference: 4
Next-hop interface: xe-0/0/47.183
So, how to ensure the two possible next-hops are copied to the
":vxlan.inet.0" table?
--
Make input easy to prepare and output self-explanatory.
- The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list