[j-nsp] Junos Telemetry Interface (JTI)
Colton Conor
colton.conor at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 07:47:25 EST 2018
Guys,
I wanted to follow up and see how things are going with JTI?
Also, it has been brought to my attention that OpenNMS supports JTI. I was
not aware of that, so I figured I would share with others:
https://docs.opennms.org/opennms/branches/develop/guide-admin/guide-admin.html#ga-telemetryd
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 12:24 PM Aaron1 <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
> Yes Niall, lets stay in touch.
>
> Thanks Tom, I’ll have to look at Panoptes
>
> Aaron
>
> > On Oct 11, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Tom Beecher <beecher at beecher.cc> wrote:
> >
> > Related, my company open sourced a tool we've been working on for
> network telemetry at NANOG in Vancouver. I'm 95% sure that a JTI receiver
> is functional on our internal builds, but they're still working on a few
> things with streaming receivers generally, so it's not yet in the public
> repo. May be something that can meet your needs at some point if you wanted
> to keep an eye on it.
> >
> > https://github.com/yahoo/panoptes
> >
> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 9:02 AM Niall Donaghy <niall.donaghy at geant.org>
> wrote:
> >> Fantastic news Aaron!
> >>
> >> That tallies with our experience of deploying the 'bundle' version of
> OpenNTI
> >> for Junos ST.
> >>
> >> We look forward to your shared experiences as you kick the tyres and -
> >> hopefully - incorporate this into your NMS/procedures. :)
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >> Niall
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Aaron Gould [mailto:aaron1 at gvtc.com]
> >> Sent: 11 October 2018 13:59
> >> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> Cc: James Burnett <james.burnett at geant.org>; Niall Donaghy
> >> <niall.donaghy at geant.org>; 'Colton Conor' <colton.conor at gmail.com>
> >> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Junos Telemetry Interface (JTI)
> >>
> >> Wanted to circle back with y'all... I finally got this working...thanks
> to
> >> techmocha10 (see below) and my linux coworker genius (Dave),
> >>
> >> I'll just copy/paste a post I just made...
> >>
> >>
> https://forums.juniper.net/t5/vMX/Telemetry-data-is-not-streaming-from-Juniper-vMX-17-4R1-16/m-p/375996#M923
> >>
> >>
> >> I got telemetry streaming working using this site ... I have a couple
> MX960's
> >> streaming telemetry to the suite of software provided in this Open-NTI
> project
> >> spoken of on this techmocha blog site. I think my previous problems
> were
> >> related to conflicting installs.... as myself and my coworker had
> loaded
> >> individual items and then the open-nti suite (which i understand is a
> docker
> >> container with all the items like grafana, fluentd, chronograf,
> influxdb,
> >> etc).... anyway, we started with a fresh install Ubunto virtual machine
> and
> >> *only* loaded Open-NTI and it works.
> >>
> >>
> >> I do not know or understand all of the innerworkings of it at this
> point, but
> >> am quickly learning, even while writing this post... I'm currently
> using
> >> Chronograf hosted at port 8888 and browsing the Data Explorer function
> and
> >> seeing some nice graphs. (I'm wondering if Chrongraf is simply an
> alternative
> >> to Grafana gui front end, unsure) There seems to be tons of items to
> monitor
> >> and analyze, and I'm currently only sending the following sensor
> resource from
> >> the MX960 and there are several more that can be sent....
> >> /junos/system/linecard/interface/
> >>
> >>
> >> I am sending the telemetry from the MX960 using UDP transport and GPB
> format
> >> to port 50000 and source port 21111 (mx960-1) and 21112 (mx960-2). I'm
> unsure
> >> that I had to use unique source ports... as I wonder if the source-ip
> would
> >> have been sufficient to make the streaming sources unique in the
> Open-NTI
> >> server.
> >>
> >>
> >> Looking at the techmocha pictures, and the "docker ps" command on the
> linux
> >> server, and now this new-found techmocha link (see "deconstructed"
> below)
> >> apparently FluentD is the TSDB (time series db) that is
> receiving/ingesting
> >> the *Native* streaming form of telemetry from my MX960's on udp port
> 50000 and
> >> looks like fluentd hands off that data to InfluxDB port 8086 (which i
> think
> >> happens internally at that server). (I'm not evening talking about the
> other
> >> form of jti telemetry using openconfig and grpc....I've yet to do that
> and
> >> don't know why I would exactly...which i beleive is ingested using
> telegraf,
> >> unsure)
> >>
> >>
> >> ...the link i followed to deploy open-nti suite....
> >>
> https://techmocha.blog/2017/06/26/using-opennti-as-a-collector-for-streaming-telemetry-from-juniper-devices-part-1/#comments
> >>
> >>
> >> ...interestingly, i just now found this, which apparently is a way of
> >> deploying all the components individually...
> >> https://techmocha.blog/2017/10/31/serving-up-opennti-deconstructed/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list