[j-nsp] dsc interface on qfx5100

[Tom Beecher]

No problem!

@Niall : I can't remember if there was something under the hood that made
the discard *interface* more preferable than just a discard *route*. In our
implementation we have a qualified next-hop to send flagged traffic to a
local collector box first, and only discard if that's not reachable, and
we're not doing anything on dsc.0 that a straight discard route couldn't
do.

Otherwise yeah, running a count filter on dsc for metrics about what the
traffic was was kinda the entire point I thought. :)

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:40 PM Jason Healy <jhealy at logn.net> wrote:

> On Oct 12, 2018, at 9:07 AM, Niall Donaghy <niall.donaghy at geant.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Yes we (large ISP) tried using dsc interfaces (MX series) to count RTBH
> > traffic and found, 1) they don't count, and 2) IPv6 is unsupported for
> dsc.
>
> That's what I needed to know!  Back to standard discard routes it is...
>
> Thanks to you and Tom for saving me any more pain trying to figure this
> out.
>
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>