[j-nsp] Juniper Buffer Bloat

[Colton Conor]

Benny,

That is what I was thinking. Throttle the customer upstream traffic at the
CPE so they can't upload anymore traffic into the network, and throttle
their downstream traffic at the provider edge (PE) or access switch so they
can't congest any more links than required.

For fq-codel on the CPE, fq-codel runs on linux / openwrt, so there are
many options there.

I am more wondering how to do this properly on the provider edge side. I
mentioned backbone/core before, and I really meant to say provider edge. On
the provider edge, that is mostly Juniper, so we can't just implement
fq-codel. So the question lines does Juniper have anything like fq-codel? I
know Juniper has the ability to shape downstream traffic, but can it do it
in a manner that doesn't increase latency like fq-codel?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 4:50 PM Benny Lyne Amorsen <benny+usenet at amorsen.dk>
wrote:

> James Bensley <jwbensley at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I'm pretty sure Juniper don't have anything like fq-codel in any of
> > their products however, the place to do that would be on the CPE or
> > edge access switch/router not your core.
>
> The CPE is a great place to put fq-codel for upstream traffic. For
> downstream traffic you need the PE device to do the queueing. Having
> fq-codel available with hierarchical queueing on the MX would be
> amazing.
>
> Apart from that, Juniper does make CPE devices...
>
>
> /Benny
>
>