[j-nsp] MX10K3 Experiences, ~2 years later

[Eldon Koyle]

Replace absurd with unexpected, then.

-- 
Eldon

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019, 02:15 Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:

> Many absurd things will become reasonable and logical when they are
> sufficiently understood.
>
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 17:22, Eldon Koyle
> <ekoyle+puck.nether.net at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > My biggest complaint about the mx10003 is the absurd port restrictions.
> If
> > you use pic-level config, you can run all ports at 40G or 4x10G, but if
> you
> > want to use port-level speed config you have to set one of every 4 ports
> to
> > 100G on pic 1 in each slot to be able to use all of the ports.
> >
> > Be sure to check your desired config for compatibility:
> > https://apps.juniper.net/home/port-checker/index.html
> >
> > --
> > Eldon
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019, 01:05 Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 18/Dec/19 19:47, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I wanted to follow up on a thread from a couple of years ago about
> the
> > > MX10003
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.gt.net/nsp/juniper/63670?search_string=mx10003
> > > >
> > > > We’ve got a bunch of MX204s that we use for peering and transit over
> LDP
> > > based L3VPN pinned up with IS-IS and BFD.  We’re quite happy with these
> > > boxes from a cost, density and feature perspective.  We’ve had no
> issues
> > > with them at all so far in the few months that they’ve been in the
> field.
> > > >
> > > > Now, we’re looking for something to use in the same role, but with
> > > higher 100G port density.  The MX10003 seems like a good fit from a
> cost
> > > perspective verses something like an MX240, but also from a feature and
> > > performance perspective because it uses the same hardware as the MX204
> in
> > > terms of EA Trios and CPU on the MPC, along with the CPU and memory on
> the
> > > RE (except the MX204 has 32GB on the RE as opposed to 64GB on the
> MX10003).
> > > >
> > > > Wondering how folks are feeling about these boxes a couple of years
> > > later.
> > >
> > > We like the MX10003 as a 100Gbps edge router. It comes with the
> > > additional port density and hardware redundancy that the MX204 doesn't
> > > have, so it does have a role to play.
> > >
> > > For customers that want 100Gbps ports, we will dump them on the
> MX10003.
> > >
> > > Mark.
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
> --
>   ++ytti
>