[j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480
Luis Balbinot
luis at luisbalbinot.com
Fri Jul 19 10:48:35 EDT 2019
Same. Juniper is running WAY too late on an ACX5048 replacement with
100G interfaces. We had great expectations for the ACX5448 until we
saw the price list being 3-4x higher than the 5048.
Regarding the original question, I'd also check the MPC5 if your
budget is restricted and you have slots to spare. You can get 12x10G
and 3x40G if you only need to serve that one customer over 40G.
Juniper's pricing for the MPC7-MRATE is also ridiculous at 2x the
price of an MX204.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 10:27 AM Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:
>
> My ISP network is core/agg mpls rings of MX960's and ACX5048's....960's
> connect 40 gig to 5048's using the MPC7E-MRATE in the MX960.
>
> Seems good to me so far....
>
> Also use MX960 40 gig on MPC7E-MRATE to DC/CDN deployments of QFX5120's
> (pure Ethernet tagging).
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list