[j-nsp] 100G DAC issue between MX204 and QFX5110
Saku Ytti
saku at ytti.fi
Thu Jun 20 09:37:57 EDT 2019
Is it just me or does 100GE have lot more interop issues than we had
with 1GE and 10GE?
Vendor rep explained it as MSA being too ambiguous so both can do
everything right and still not interop, unsure if defensive or
factual.
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 16:34, Tim Jackson <jackson.tim at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We've actually had the reverse issue where 17.4 is the only release that
> some DACs will function. Any 18.x release seems to break them. These aren't
> Juniper coded DACs, but just generic coded:
>
> https://paste.somuch.fail/?248d62d55916f17b#+flZp6LEb0ZY48AI/3rc4YidWw6LENIQTPxpc4O6j7g=
>
> --
> Tim
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 8:24 AM Chris Wopat <me at falz.net> wrote:
>
> > We have tested flexoptix 3rd party DAC between MX204 and QFX5120/QFX10002
> > with mixed results. Per release notes/ HCL, DAC isn't supported on MX204
> > until 18.2
> >
> > https://apps.juniper.net/hct/product/#prd=MX204
> >
> > We couldn't link anything with mx204 dac on anything below 18.2. There are
> > also a few DAC related PRs in the 18.2r1 release notes.
> >
> >
> > https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/information-products/topic-collections/release-notes/18.2/junos-release-notes-18.2.pdf
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
++ytti
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list