[j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240??

[Mark Tinka]

On 8/Nov/19 18:39, Clarke Morledge wrote:

>  
>
> So, if you do not need a lot of speeds and feeds, and can live without
> a physical backup RE, the MX204 would be a good alternative to a MX240.

Our use-case for the MX204 is:

    - 10Gbps capability in the Metro. Hardware redundancy not necessary,
as revenues don't justify it.
    - Peering and transit routers. Multiple entry/exit points, so
hardware redundancy is not necessary.

Our use-case for the MX480 (MX204 is too small):

    - High-touch edge services for customers.

Mark.