[j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240??
adamv0025 at netconsultings.com
adamv0025 at netconsultings.com
Thu Nov 14 11:02:11 EST 2019
> From: Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi>
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2019 1:31 PM
>
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 15:18, <adamv0025 at netconsultings.com> wrote:
>
>
> > But still I don't see how the LU microcode has the ability to actually
> > generate packets, let alone to host a complete daemon.
>
> It does, there is dispatch block in LU, in this callout block you generate parcel
> in timed manner, which will be given to some PPE, which causes the PPE to
> execute the correct microcode.
>
> PPM on LC CPU:
> IMPC0(r33.labxtx01.us.bb-re1 vty)# show ppm adjacencies
>
>
> PPM on NPU:
> IMPC0(r33.labxtx01.us.bb-re1 vty)# show ppm inline sessions
> bfd show PPM inline sessions for BFD
> cfm show PPM inline sessions for CFM
> lacp show PPM inline sessions for LACP
> lfm show PPM inline sessions for LFM
> vrrp show PPM inline sessions for VRRP
>
Interesting thanks a bunch,
So I guess this would be RE:
user at LAB> show ppm adjacencies
Protocol Hold time (msec)
BFD 3000
This would be LC CPU:
NPC10(LAB vty)# show ppm adjacencies
PPM distributed adjacencies
Protocol Holdtime (msec) PPM handle Inline
BFD 1500 1424 Yes
BFD 1500 1426 Yes
BFD 1500 1430 Yes
BFD 1500 1436 Yes
BFD 1500 1438 Yes
BFD 1500 1440 Yes
LACP 3000 1398 No
LACP 3000 1399 No
Total adjacencies: 8
NPC10(LAB vty)# show ppm inline sessions bfd
BFD Transmit Sessions:
----------------------
Handle Key
====== ===
1 0x01000004F0
2 0x01000004F1
4 0x01000004F4
15 0x01000004F8
17 0x01000004FA
18 0x01000004FB
Total sessions 6.
BFD Adjacency Sessions:
-----------------------
Handle Key
====== ===
13 0x00000004F0
14 0x00000004F1
10 0x00000004F4
16 0x00000004F8
19 0x00000004FA
20 0x00000004FB
Total sessions 6.
Looks like I see the BDF sessions all over the place on that lab box :)
adam
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list