[j-nsp] Managing MX480 fxp0

[Aaron Gould]

Thanks again (Chris) for solving my vpls/irb/tagging combination problem
yesterday. we can bridge successfully now. 

 

Taking this one step further, we now are trying to route via fxp0 and
*through* it to the irb.100 interface and are unable to.

 

Is it possible to route traffic *through* an fxp0 interface ? (MX204)

 

I'm asking since it seems that someone mentioned that it is in fact possible
with some sort of static routes.  but I'm unsure what they meant exactly.

 

If it's definitely not possible to transit an fxp0 interface, I just need to
know that, and I will seek solutions using a revenue interface instead.

 

Resurrecting an old thread(s)..

https://www.mail-archive.com/juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net/msg09809.html   

https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2010-August/017545.html 

 

subnet A---------fxp0/mx204/irb.100------------subnet B

 

<-------------------is bi-dir comms possible?-------------->

 

 

-Aaron