[j-nsp] Suggestions for Edge/Peering Router..
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Sep 19 03:09:50 EDT 2019
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 05:04:54PM +1200, Phil Reilly wrote:
> MX104's are the dual brain unit of the 204. Though a 204 has 40/100G
> capabilities. If I read your original request correctly about ip
> routing. Not sure the 104/204 is grunty enough to deal with multiple
> internet tables. Thats a demanding task these days best left to the
> larger chassis.
You can't really compare MX104 to MX204.
The MX104 is ppc based and *slow*, and should have never ever shipped.
The MX204 is a really really nice box, with a fast intel RE and 40/100G
ports (though some - documented - restrictions on how they can be combined),
and from a RE/BGP point of view, en par with the larger MXes.
And given the price point of the MX204, if the amount of interfaces is
sufficient, just get two of them :-)
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20190919/515d6a0c/attachment.sig>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list