[j-nsp] PTX 10003 and Junos EVO

[Anton Yurchenko]

Looking at it as a possible replacement for 10008 chassis in new 
deployments, 10003-60 or 180 would both be a good fit depending 
site/density.

Have not ordered it, will have demo unit to play soon.

But even after testing/POC, running cutting edge Junos is risky. Asking 
here, maybe Junos EVO is actually much better then I expected.



On 9/25/19 3:47 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Did you already get the 10003?  I have experience with the 72q/60c but not the 80/160 yet (I think it’s in the lab now).
>
> - Jared
>
>> On Sep 25, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Anton Yurchenko <ayurchenko at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Can anybody share experiences with PTX 10003 and Junos EVO? Specifically looking to use it in MPLS/RSVP-TE LSR/LER role. It will also have have ~20-30 BGP peerings with 10-20 BGP full routing tables from transit peers.
>>
>> The hardware of the box looks very nice, but going to Junos EVO 19.x seems risky, based on past experiences of running fresh Junos.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp