[j-nsp] SRGB Allocation
Vladimir Blazhkun
v.blazhkun at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 10:17:37 EDT 2020
I vote for static Adj-SID allocations for the SR-MPLS. It makes operations much more convenient as one might arrange a map of interface name (index) to an Adj-SID.
--
Vladimir Blazhkun (via iPhone).
> On 11 Aug 2020, at 16:58, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com> wrote:
>
> Adjacency SID’s are less of a problem since they are effectively locally significant – but again, you ideally want to track these if you are doing static.
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list