[j-nsp] SRGB Allocation

Vladimir Blazhkun v.blazhkun at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 10:17:37 EDT 2020


I vote for static Adj-SID allocations for the SR-MPLS. It makes operations much more convenient as one might arrange a map of interface name (index) to an Adj-SID.

-- 
Vladimir Blazhkun (via iPhone).

> On 11 Aug 2020, at 16:58, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com> wrote:
> 
> Adjacency SID’s are less of a problem since they are effectively locally significant – but again, you ideally want to track these if you are doing static.


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list