[j-nsp] Any red flags on this MX240 configuration...
Alain Hebert
ahebert at pubnix.net
Wed Feb 26 08:46:42 EST 2020
Beside the RE-S-2000-4096-S being EOL. My experience with 16.2 was
pretty solid.
We're planning to have 3 Full Routes BGP and the MPLS alphabet
soup, yadi yada.
We don't want 2 RE since we'll use 2 MX240 and there is no point to
go for ISSU since the RE is EOL.
1x CHAS-BP-MX240-S
1x FFANTRAY-MX240-HC
1x RE-S-2000-4096-S
1x SCBE-MX-S
2x PWR-MX480-1200-AC
1x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP
--
-----
Alain Hebert ahebert at pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net Fax: 514-990-9443
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list