[j-nsp] Any red flags on this MX240 configuration...

Alain Hebert ahebert at pubnix.net
Wed Feb 26 08:46:42 EST 2020


     Beside the RE-S-2000-4096-S being EOL.  My experience with 16.2 was 
pretty solid.

     We're planning to have 3 Full Routes BGP and the MPLS alphabet 
soup, yadi yada.

     We don't want 2 RE since we'll use 2 MX240 and there is no point to 
go for ISSU since the RE is EOL.

    1x CHAS-BP-MX240-S
    1x FFANTRAY-MX240-HC
    1x RE-S-2000-4096-S
    1x SCBE-MX-S
    2x PWR-MX480-1200-AC
    1x MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP

-- 

-----
Alain Hebert                                ahebert at pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770     Beaconsfield, Quebec     H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911  http://www.pubnix.net    Fax: 514-990-9443



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list