[j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710

[Luis Balbinot]

The 5448 and the 5048 are quite different. I have several 5048 in my plant
and when we questioned Juniper about a replacement with 100G interfaces
their engineers compared the config template from our 5048s and said the
5448 wasn't capable of doing some of the RSVP and RPM stuff we were doing
on the 5048. This was about 6 months ago.

Luis

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:45 PM Aaron Gould <aaron1 at gvtc.com> wrote:

> I've had an ACX5448 in my lab on loaner for over a year.  I need to refresh
> myself on how well it performed.  I have the little-brother ACX5048,
> probably 50 of them all over my network doing quite well.  Pretty sure
> those
> are not Trio based.
>
> Never heard of the ACX710, but see it in slide 22 here ...
>
> https://senetsy.ru/upload/juniper-summit-2019/5G-ready_Transport_Networks_Ev
> genii_Bugakov_Juniper.pdf
> <https://senetsy.ru/upload/juniper-summit-2019/5G-ready_Transport_Networks_Evgenii_Bugakov_Juniper.pdf>
> ACX710 and ACX753.  I'm curious about interfaces and modules and
> capabilities of both of them.
>
> -Aaron
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>