[j-nsp] MX960 vs MX10K

[Chris Kawchuk]

Only question is if it needs stateful-ness or not (IPSEC, CGNAT etc...), but only the OP can answer that.

- CK.


> On 5 Mar 2020, at 2:39 pm, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/Mar/20 05:32, Chris Kawchuk wrote:
> 
>> Just to chime in --- for scale-out, wouldn't you be better offloading those MS-MPC functions to another box? (i.e. VM/Dedicated Appliance/etc..?).
>> 
>> You burn slots for the MSMPC plus you burn the backplane crossing twice; so it's at worst a neutral proposition to externalise it and add low-cost non-HQoS ports to feed it.
>> 
>> or is it the case of limited space/power/RUs/want-it-all-in-one-box? and yes, MS-MPC won't scale to Nx100G of workload.
> 
> And along that line, are the services the OP needs on the MS-MPC not
> available natively in the MX10000/960/480/240 line cards?
> 
> Mark.
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp