[j-nsp] BGP full mesh or route reflector
James Bensley
lists+junipernsp at bensley.me
Wed Jan 21 08:43:06 EST 2026
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Wednesday, January 21st, 2026 at 13:56, Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:
> Many here, myself included, would think they were right. I think you
> start with the assumption you need RR and provide strong rationale why
> not. And if no one feels strongly, do RR.
Agree to disagree then :)
I don't think you should start with any assumptions (even if they have been the outcome in 95% of cases).
Cheers,
James.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: ProtonMail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=djPQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: publickey - lists+junipernsp at bensley.me - 0x3E936359.asc.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 636 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20260121/4ef7d9fe/attachment.sig>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list