[nsp-sec] UDP based DDoS attack against 80.65.160.10 (AS21196)

Gong, Yiming yiming.gong at xo.com
Fri Mar 7 16:10:28 EST 2008


I just did a search in my alert database, and found on Mar 01, there was
a half hour UDP flood against this 80.65.160.10

+---------------------+--------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-
-------+------+-----------+
| time                | ip           | flows | packets | bytes | pps  |
bps    | bpp  | alerttype |
+---------------------+--------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-
-------+------+-----------+
| 2008-03-01 07:33:16 | 80.65.160.10 | 37    |    3915 | 5.1M  |   13 |
144506 | 1363 | traffic   | 
| 2008-03-01 07:43:13 | 80.65.160.10 | 34    |    3761 | 4.9M  |   12 |
136922 | 1364 | traffic   | 
| 2008-03-01 07:53:19 | 80.65.160.10 | 31    |    3391 | 4.4M  |   11 |
125536 | 1364 | traffic   | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | 80.65.160.10 | 34    |    3855 | 5.0M  |   12 |
140132 | 1362 | traffic   | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:05 | 80.65.160.10 | 10    |    4685 | 6.1M  |   15 |
164475 | 1366 | traffic   | 
+---------------------+--------------+-------+---------+-------+------+-
-------+------+-----------+

And all the traffic came from one single source IP, 218.239.45.174, src
0, dst 0, 

-Snip-
+---------------------+------+----------------+-------+--------------+--
-----+--------+--------+
| time                | pro  | sip            | sport | dip          |
dport | flags  | bytes  |
+---------------------+------+----------------+-------+--------------+--
-----+--------+--------+
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 141775 | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 139932 | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 123262 | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 110965 | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 135999 | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 185890 | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 127072 | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 135405 | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 134195 | 
| 2008-03-01 08:03:12 | UDP  | 218.239.45.174 | 0     | 80.65.160.10 | 0
| ...... | 143014 | 

whois -h whois.cymru.com  218.239.45.174
AS      | IP               | AS Name
9318    | 218.239.45.174   | HANARO-AS Hanaro Telecom Inc.


Also: 

I constantly see UDP src 0 dst 0 traffic|session spikes on our network
and therefore get UDP aberrant alerts a lot, I think maybe 1/5 of all
the UDP alerts I get are related to UDP port 0, and most of these alerts
only contain one or a few source Ips. Anyone sees this type of traffic
on your network often?

Regards,
 
Yiming
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsp-security-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:nsp-security-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of 
> Chris Morrow
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 2:12 PM
> To: Smith, Donald
> Cc: nsp-security NSP
> Subject: Re: [nsp-sec] UDP based DDoS attack against 
> 80.65.160.10 (AS21196)
> 
> ----------- nsp-security Confidential --------
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Smith, Donald wrote:
> 
> > ----------- nsp-security Confidential --------
> >
> > Nic if they can they should block udp 0 <-> udp 0 somewhere 
> upstream.
> > That accounts for a very large portion of this attack and 
> is invalid:)
> 
> udp 0/0 == frags of udp (sometimes, like nfs servers I've 
> seen do this) though, it's also probably attack traffic in some cases.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nsp-security mailing list
> nsp-security at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/nsp-security
> 
> Please do not Forward, CC, or BCC this E-mail outside of the 
> nsp-security
> community. Confidentiality is essential for effective 
> Internet security counter-measures.
> _______________________________________________
> 



More information about the nsp-security mailing list